Section 101 of 105
98. AI Augmentation and Human Accountability
Stable section ID: S05-CON-014-SECTION-101 · 26 content blocks
Artificial Intelligence shall augment human engineering capability without replacing accountable authority.
AI may support:
- Analysis.
- Option generation.
- Optimization.
- Anomaly detection.
- Prediction.
- Documentation.
- Maintenance planning.
- Operational assistance.
- Evidence review.
- Robotic planning.
AI-generated outputs shall remain identifiable as recommendations, analyses, or inferences until they receive the required verification and approval.
Every AI-influenced engineering decision shall identify:
- AI system and version.
- Input information.
- Intended use.
- Output.
- Known limitations.
- Confidence and uncertainty.
- Reviewing authority.
- Final decision.
- Supporting evidence.
AI shall not independently approve structural design, life-safety compliance, certification, irreversible physical change, or a Building BIOS modification unless a future constitutional authorization explicitly permits that function.
Human review shall be meaningful and shall not consist only of accepting an opaque output without adequate competence, information, or time.
When AI recommendations conflict with verified evidence, constitutional Rules, or physical safety, the verified and safer basis shall prevail.